Showing posts with label MIS 2 Assignments. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MIS 2 Assignments. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 30, 2009

Steps in CSF Approach

Identify and discuss the steps for "critical success factors" approach? (at least 1,500 words)

Critical Success Factor
Arrow A key area where satisfactory performance is required for the organization to achieve its goals
Arrow A means of identifying the tasks and requirements needed for success
Arrow At the lowest level, CSFs become concrete requirements
Arrow A means to prioritize requirements

Critical Success Factors are the essential areas of activity that must be performed well to achieve the mission, objectives or goals for a business or project. By identifying the Critical Success Factors, it can create a common point of reference to help direct and measure the success of the business or project. As a common point of reference, Critical Success Factors help everyone in the team to know exactly what's the most important. And this helps people perform their own work in the right context and so pull together towards the same overall aims.

Executives and employees spend a fair amount of time doing things which don't really make the business more successful. When you stop to consider it, there are only generally a limited number of areas - like sales or product development - which make your business succeed. With insight and analysis you can select these things, the critical success factors. A business will succeed or fail depending on how you approach your unique set of critical success factors. Understanding these factors and paying 100% attention to them is a sure way to add power to your efforts and jump start towards a new level of performance.

Steps in Critical Success Factors Approach:

Step 1: Identify your critical success factors
Step 2: Establishing the measurements
Step 3: Setting the baseline
Step 4: Set new goals
Step 5: Closing the gap
Step 6: The Ben Franklin Rotation Program

Step 1: Identify your critical success factors

The first step is to identify the special set of CSFs. This may have already crossed peoples mind in the past, and answered it by instinct. The answers maybe correct answers, but they have to think deeper and broader. I have read from http://www.paullemberg.com/criticalfactors.html a list of factors believed to critical in an enterprise. The list below are only based on that site, this also depends on the business that you have. You may add factors to the list to describe the critical influences on a business' success.

Distribution - this could be direct sales, telesales, third- party sales, etc.Lead generationCustomer satisfaction
ReferralsResearchProduct development
Production, including quality, costing, run-rates, etc.Sufficient investment capital, sufficient working capitalCustomer support / technical support
Quality assuranceSales process / sales life cycleMarket research
Customer educationSales compensationRecruiting
Personnel retention programsExpense managementIntellectual capital development
TrainingMarketing communicationsLogistics
Employee equityExecutive leadershipTraining and development
Corporate goals / strategic objectivesValues and beliefsMission/purpose
Individual accountabilityProductivity & effectiveness metricsInternal communications
Strategic and tactical planningExecutive teamBoard of directors/advisors


It is a must to be specific when identifying the CSFs. Don't say "people" when the issue is recruiting, employee satisfaction, training or compensation. Don't say "marketing" or "sales" when the issue is lead generation. Test your assumptions by imagining a decline in a particular factor. You should be able to think of the pros and cons of each factors then come up with a solution for each cons.

In selecting factors, limit your list to no more than seven. Why seven? Cognitive theory suggests that human minds are efficient at juggling from five to nine separate trains of thought - the average and oft- quoted number is seven. Our plan is for you to keep your eye on the ball, you want to limit the balls to those you can keep your eye on.

Step 2: Establishing the measurements

Your next step is to establish a measurement scale for each critical factor. Some of these measures will be quantitative; some qualitative. Sales is an easy one: dollars of revenue measured against budget. Leads generated is also easy - how many? You can further break down sales by product and leads by sources, or you can stick to the consolidated numbers. Choose the measure which best reflects your understanding of how the issue affects your business.

Everything is measurable, you just need the right system. How can you measure your effectiveness in sales compensation? You could establish a compound metric which includes total compensation as a percentage of sales revenue, juxtaposed against goal attainment. Marketing communications is also difficult. One way to measure this is to subjectively assess the quality of your marcom pieces; you could also measure whether you have the total complement of marcom pieces you require. Or, measure whether prospects respond to your marcom efforts. Most likely you will combine all three to get one measure. A final example is measuring your efforts in the area of your Board of Directors / Board of Advisors. Measures include: do you have one? Are all the board seats filled? Is the board effective for your intended purpose? Measuring the Board factor would likely blend each of these.

Step 3: Setting the baseline

Once you've established a measurement structure for a factor, the next step is setting a baseline. Each factor should be set against a normalizing scale ranging from 1 to 10. Subjectively this can translate into non-performing(1), poor (2-3) , mediocre (4-5), good (6-7), great (8-9), and outstanding (10).

Step 4: Set new goals

Next, create a "gap" between where you are - your baseline - and your target for that factor. You already have a sales plan, so your gap exists between your current revenue and your budgeted revenue. You may consider your baseline a 5, and your target an 8. Implicit in this 1- 10 scale are judgements about your intentions: will reaching your budgeted revenue put you at 8 (almost great) or 10 (outstanding)? Where do you want to peg your efforts? If you've assessed your employee training at a 4 (mediocre), are you shooting for a 7 (good) or a 9 (great)? You can see from this how your measurement structure and goal system will impact how you allocate your company's resources and energy.

Step 5: Closing the gap

You now have a baseline and a target for each factor. Between them they define a factor gap - your challenge is to close it. Each gap becomes the focus of a meditation which asks the question: What will close the gap between our current level of this factor and our desired level? What possible actions will raise that measurement? You may have intuitive responses to these questions, and when appropriate, trust your gut. If need be, back that gut response with research - but only when cost effective. (Sometimes the most cost effective research is implementation, particularly in simple matters.)

Use any idea generation process you are comfortable with. Develop several possible initiatives to raise the level of that factor. With luck your ideas will work together and harmonize in terms of impact or implementation requirements. If you create competing ideas, select the best alternatives. Choose based on return on investment, required resources, scheduling conflicts, time to impact, total cost, and likelihood of success versus risk of failure. Depending on the specific factor, and the size of the gap, you may plan to close it in stages or shoot the gap all at once. You can launch one initiative at a time, or implement several initiatives in parallel. You may find my GamePlan!" methods useful in designing your gap-closing programs. Once you launch your gap-closing initiatives, continually measure your results. Report your progress to participants and stakeholders, and post it publicly.

Step 6: The Ben Franklin Rotation Program

As a young adult, Ben Franklin identified thirteen virtues he aspired to. In order to implement these virtues in his life he devised a "Plan for Self Examination", a program whereby he focused his attention, one virtue at a time, for one week at a time, rotating through the entire list four times a year. He kept a detailed log of the actions he took to develop the virtues in himself, along with his personal results. The article I've read adapted Franklin's concept and called it the Ben Franklin Rotation Program. At any point in time, you will have in place a program for improving every one of your critical factors. But in any given week, your primary attention will be on only one factor.

Using Franklin's principles, at the beginning of each week, focus your mind - or collective mind of your management team - on improving that week's factor. What new actions can you take, what new attitudes can you adopt, what new or renewed approaches are available - which will enhance your performance in that one specific area? Do that "thing" wholeheartedly for the entire week. Franklin also shows us how to track your progress in this venture. Create a score sheet detailing your Critical Success Factors. This sheet should detail each factor, its measurements, your current 1-10 rating and your target rating, along with your next action steps for improving that rating. Each factor also gets a weight, which enables you to develop an overall score. Each week, re-rate all the factors on the score sheet, and graph your progress. You may also graph the overall score. Publish the score sheet and the graphs. You can establish a reward system based on individual progress, or, using the factor weights, you can develop a bonus structure which incentivizes total progress.

This simple system will focus your attention on improving each one of your critical success factors. With carefully selected factors, you insure both rapid performance increases and balance in your company.


Critical Success Factors therefore produces results that express the needs of the enterprise clearly and (hopefully) completely. In addition it also allows us to measure success and prioritize goals in a sensible way. CSFs when used together with traditional usage scenarios, ensures that the needs of both the user and the enterprise are being met.



References:

Monday, December 21, 2009

Radical type of change

In the spectrum of organizational change, which is the most radical type of change: automation, rationalization of procedures, business reengineering, or paradigm shifts?

Change can take many forms; it can be planned or unplanned, incremental or radical , and recurrent or unprecedented. Trends in the process or sequence of changes can be observed over time. These trends can be accelerating or decelerating in time, and they can move toward equilibrium, oscillation, chaos, or randomness in the behavior of the organizational enitity being examined. Thus, the basic concept of organization change involves three ideas: difference, at different temporal moments, between states of an organizational unit or system.

Automation
-Mechanizing procedures to speed up the performance of existing tasks.
-most common form of IT-enabled change
-involves assisting employees perform their tasks more efficiently and effectively
-akin to putting a larger motor in an existing vehicle


Rationalization of Procedures
-The streamlining of existing operating procedures, eliminating obvious bottlenecks so that automation makes operating procedures more efficient
-follows quickly from early automation
[size=10] [Toshiba had to rationalize its procedures down to the level of installation manuals and software instruction and had to create standard names and formats for the data items in its global data warehouse. Without a large amount of business process rationalization, computer technology would have been useless at Toshiba (what ERPs do) ]


Business Reengineering
-The radical redesign of business processes, combining steps to cut waste and eliminate repetitive, paper-intensive tasks to improve cost, quality, and service and to maximize the benefits of information technology
-Involves radical rethinking
-Can change the way an organization conducts its business
-Strikes fear, its expensive, its very risky and its extremely difficult to carry out and manage
-Develop the business vision and process objective

Business Process Re-engineering Steps:
-Identify the processes to be redesigned (core and highest payback)
-Understand and measure the performance of existing processes
-Identify the opportunities for applying information technology
-Build a prototype of the new process


Paradigm Shifts
-Radical reconceptualization of the nature of the business and the nature of the organization
-akin to rethinking not only the automobile, but transportation itself
-e-business is a paradigm shift
-Deciding which business process to get right is half the challenge
-70% of time programmatic reengineering efforts fail
-Why then change? Because the rewards are high!


Each kinds of structural organizational change that are enabled by IT carries different rewards and risks. The most common form of IT-enabled organizational change or the first phase of IT adoption is automation. This has allowed employees to automate a number of time-consuming and error-prone activities and gain benefits in cycle-time, productivity, and accuracy. For example, a main contractor makes use of standalone software to keep track all Request For Information (RFI) in a project.

A deeper form of organization change or the second phase of IT adoption is rationalization of procedures. Automation frequently reveals bottlenecks in production and makes the existing arrangement of procedures and structures painfully cumbersome. Rationalization of procedures involves the streamlining of standard operating procedures, which eliminates obvious bottlenecks, so that operating procedures become more efficient. Roughly speaking, it is a process of fine tuning the first step. For example, the main contractor implements an intranet and standardizes the data in RFI across all projects in the enterprise.


A more powerful type of organizational change or the third phase of IT adoption is business process reengineering, in which business processes are analyzed, simplified, and redesigned. Reengineering involves radically rethinking the flow of work and the construction business processes with the intention to radically reduce the costs of businesses. Using IT, organizations can rethink and streamline their business processes to improve speed, service, and quality. Business process reengineering reorganizes workflows, combining steps to cut waste and eliminate repetitive, paper-intensive tasks. It is much more ambitious than rationalization of procedures because it requires a new vision of how the process is to be organized. For example, the main contractor sets up an extranet to online collaborate with the architect for the RFI process.

Paradigm Shift is the fourth kind of structural organizational change that are enabled by IT. It is a dramatic change in methodology or practice. It often refers to a major change in thinking and planning, which ultimately changes the way projects are implemented. For example, accessing applications and data from the Web instead of from local servers is a paradigm shift.

Not many construction industry players have moved beyond the first phase of automation. However, there are some companies have committed to a continuing investment in technological advancement and organizational change. By changing how they are organized and do business, they have achieved far greater benefits than available through automation alone. Companies like this have succeeded in staying ahead of their competitors not merely by automating but by changing their organization as well. Their strategic advantage has been their preparedness and ability to continually be innovative, and to manage the change necessary to gain substantial business benefits.

The changes in technology has impact the whole sectors and even the whole society. This is because the changes take place at system level, involving technology and market shifts. This involves the convergence of a number of trends which result in a 'paradigm shift' where the old order is replaced. For example, the invention of computer has long been replaced the usage of a typewriter, and since after the appearance of this computer, scenario of the workplace has changed significantly. We can see that all the work can be done in a short time. Computer has become a crucial tool in any office in the world. There are many examples of the technology advances such as the internet, e-business, mobile phone and many more that makes every activities becomes faster and easier. Therefore, based on my readings the most radical type of change are all of the aforementioned structural organizational change, beginning from Automation (wherein an organization will adopt what's the latest technology) proceeds Rationalization of Procedures (which eliminates bottleneck to make automation efficient) followed by Business Process Re engineering (which maximizes the benefits of IT) and lastly is the Paradigm shift (which is a transformation driven by change).



References:

Wednesday, December 16, 2009

Expedite the implementation of the IS plan

You were invited by the university president to prepare an IS plan for the university, discuss what are the steps in order to expedite the implementation of the IS plan.


Preparing an Information Systems Plan for the university is a very challenging task because a lot of things are to be considered when we talk of Information System Planning. Planning for information systems, as for any other system, begins with the identification of needs. In order to be effective, development of any type of computer-based system should be a response to need--whether at the transaction processing level or at the more complex information and support systems levels. Such planning for information systems is much like strategic planning in management. Objectives, priorities, and authorization for information systems projects need to be formalized. The systems development plan should identify specific projects slated for the future, priorities for each project and for resources, general procedures, and constraints for each application area. The plan must be specific enough to enable understanding of each application and to know where it stands in the order of development. Also the plan should be flexible so that priorities can be adjusted if necessary. There was an article which contains an argument that a strategic capability architecture - a flexible and continuously improving infrastructure of organizational capabilities - is the primary basis for a company's sustainable competitive advantage. It has emphasized the need for continuously updating and improving the strategic capabilities architecture.

Some characteristics of strategic IS planning are:

• Main task: strategic/competitive advantage, linkage to business strategy.
• Key objective: pursuing opportunities, integrating IS and business strategies
• Direction from: executives/senior management and users, coalition of users/management and information systems.
• Main approach: entrepreneurial (user innovation), multiple (bottom-up development, top down analysis, etc.) at the same time.

Implementing the proposed Information Systems Plan is ,in my own perspective, the second toughest thing to do in Information Systems Planning. All the hard works starting from the identification of needs, then formalizing the objectives, priorities, and authorization for the information systems project, and all the necessary things needed to be done in planning information systems will not be appreciated if the said information systems plan will not be properly implemented or worst, will never be implemented because of some user resistance. Thus, in an information systems planning, steps for implementing the proposed information systems plan should be included -- which is in fact already the situation but I just wanted to emphasize why it should be included.hehe

One of the important factors in implementing the Information Systems Plan is that it should be useful so that there will be no user resistance and the organization itself will be satisfied and be convinced to implement the proposed information systems plan. Let me present to you a table of the characteristics of a Quality ISP, a quality ISP must exhibit five distinct characteristics before it is useful. These five are presented in the table that follows.

Characteristic
Description
TimelyThe ISP must be timely. An ISP that is created long after it is needed is useless. In almost all cases, it makes no sense to take longer to plan work than to perform the work planned.
UseableThe ISP must be useable. It must be so for all the projects as well as for each project. The ISP should exist in sections that once adopted can be parceled out to project managers and immediately started.
MaintainableThe ISP must be maintainable. New business opportunities, new computers, business mergers, etc. all affect the ISP. The ISP must support quick changes to the estimates, technologies employed, and possibly even to the fundamental project sequences. Once these changes are accomplished, the new ISP should be just a few computer program executions away.
QualityWhile the ISP must be a quality product, no ISP is ever perfect on the first try. As the ISP is executed, the metrics employed to derive the individual project estimates become refined as a consequence of new hardware technologies, code generators, techniques, or faster working staff. As these changes occur, their effects should be installable into the data that supports ISP computation. In short, the ISP is a living document. It should be updated with every technology event, and certainly no less often than quarterly.
ReproducibleThe ISP must be reproducible. That is, when its development activities are performed by any other staff, the ISP produced should essentially be the same. The ISP should not significantly vary by staff assigned.


Whenever a proposal for the development of an ISP is created it must be assessed against these five characteristics. If any fail or not addressed in an optimum way, the entire set of funds for the development of an ISP is risked.

In my own reflection, to expedite the implementation of the proposed Information Systems Plan, it should be totally supported by all -- 'all' means including the students, the board of directors, the faculty and everyone who will be affected by this plan. But how can it be supported by the students if the students are not informed about it? Or the information disseminated to the students are not enough? Which might make the students misunderstood the ISP, in result they will resist from implementing it. Hence, informing the students or having a proper conference regarding this matter would be very helpful for the students to be enlightened and even have their questions answered. This also should be done for other concerns not only for the students, I have just specified the students as an instance since I am a student, hehe. In addition, the budget should also be properly allocated. We all know that money can speed up things, in one way or another. Lastly, the proposed Information Systems Plan should be very convincing and properly planned so that it will deserve a nod to everyone.




References:

Saturday, November 14, 2009

10 years from now

Think about yourself worthy to be called as IT professional, how do you see yourself 10 years from now, what are your strategies to get there?

I have to finish my studies in Bachelor of Science in Information Technology by the year 2011. Four years ago when I found out that Bachelor of Science in Computer Engineering is not offered here in our university -- University of Southeastern Philippines-- and when I decided to just enroll as a Bachelor of Science in Information Technology student, I actually planned to finish my studies in Bachor of Science in Information Technology by the year 2010. But unfortunately because of my negligence, that foresaid plan failed, hence I planned to fail.

Anyway, after I graduate, I would like to create a system suited to help a treasurers' tasks in an organization. Specifically in producing reports such as: Cash Position Report, Summary of Collections, Summary of Disbursements, Trial Balance, Balance Sheet, Monthly Spread and the likes. I wanted to create this kind of system because my Aunt is a treasurer in a small developing organization and she sometimes asks me to lend a hand in recording some of the transactions and sometimes produce a report out of it (of course, she'll check it first if I have done it correctly.hehe). I find it bothersome to do some of the encoding whenever the thought that it could actually be automated crosses my mind, especially typing names repetitively (who are members of the organization) and the balancing part. So I promised to myself that I will create a system that caters to that kind of service, or a system that will actually automate all the reports that my Aunt needs to produce as a treasurer. In creating this kind of system I could actually be able to review and put into application what I have studied for five years. If ever I will be successful in creating this system it will eventually boost my confidence and I will be convinced that I am worthy to be called an IT professional or an IT Specialist, in a nutshell the accomplishment of this system will be my very first achievement as an IT Professional.

I plan to take my masteral degree, but until now I am not sure if it will be right after I graduate or will it be after I finish the system. But I would really like to take it only after I finish the system, what is boggling me is the thought that I would be so captivated in creating systems and as a result I will keep on postponing on taking my masteral degree. Oh, just now, after stating the previous sentences I realized that I should take my masteral degree right after i graduate (hehe) and maybe start creating the system (the paperworks to start with) during my free time in my masterals’. In that way, I could still apply in my system what I will learn during the masteral and I could spend my free time productively and not on senseless matters.

Those are the first two things that I wanted to fulfill after I graduate as a Bachelor of Science in Information Technology student. Hopefully I could achieve those by the year 2013, that is two years after graduating Bachelor of Science in Information Technology. However, if I will not be fascinated and engrossed with creating systems, if the 'i-want-more' attitude of mine will occur and my interest in taking up Bachelor of Science in Computer Engineering is still alive, then I will surely enroll as a Bachelor of Science in Computer Engineering student in a university who is known to produce great Computer Engineers! In addition, I will make sure that while I am studying BSComEng I will have a part-time online job -- a job that is somehow related and fitted to a person who had finished her Masteral Degree in IT. It could be an online job under the leading Internet search engine, offering targeted search results from billions of Web pages, no less than the Google Inc. Eventually, my position and/or my income will buildup. Within five years or less, I will be able to finish BSComEng, currently there is no licensure examination for Computer Engineers but if ever there will be on the years to come I will surely take that licensure examination. So by the year 2019, I will be a regular and one of the most treasured employee of Google Inc.

Before this post ends, I would just like to share what Tom Landry (an American football player and coach, legendary for his successes as the coach of the Dallas Cowboys and ranked as one of the greatest and most innovative coaches in NFL history) said: "Setting a goal is not the main thing. It is deciding how you will go about achieving it and staying with that plan."


References: